Disagree, but not disobey
Several congressmen are restive. They are dismayed by many alleged “flip-flopping” decisions of the Supreme Court and are threatening to […]
Disagree, but not disobey Read More »
Several congressmen are restive. They are dismayed by many alleged “flip-flopping” decisions of the Supreme Court and are threatening to […]
Disagree, but not disobey Read More »
Did the “realignment” made by nine senators of their Priority Development Assistance Fund in the 2014 national budget violate the
Are the PDAF ‘realignments’ constitutional? Read More »
Unknown to many, the Supreme Court issued “motu proprio” (on its own volition) a resolution, dated Dec. 10, 2013 (a
SC hastens Maguindanao massacre cases Read More »
The Constitution states, “Members of the Supreme Court and judges of lower courts shall hold office during good behavior until
What retired SC justices do Read More »
Good news! Prior to its adjournment for the holidays, the Senate started plenary deliberation on the freedom of information (FOI)
Freedom of information Read More »
The Supreme Court assured a “Merry Christmas” for our senior citizens when it affirmed the constitutionality and mandatory character of
SC: Seniors’ discounts constitutional Read More »
The recent signing of the “Annex on Power Sharing” of the Framework Agreement on the Bangsamoro (FAB) is a significant
The committee on suffrage and electoral reforms of the House of Representatives recently approved a bill prohibiting political dynasties. Titled
Political dynasties: bane or boon? Read More »
Almost universal acclaim greeted the Supreme Court’s decision slaying the Priority Development Assistance Fund or PDAF. Although the reasons used
Beyond the PDAF decision Read More »
The Supreme Court decision banishing the Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and directing “within the bounds of reasonable dispatch” the